Commonwealth Monetary Community nonetheless might must pay as a lot as $111.5 million in damages tied to an almost five-year-old Securities and Alternate Fee criticism it’s preventing, though the funding advisor expects to guide not more than a $24 million loss.

The SEC sued Commonwealth in 2019, alleging that from no less than July 2014 by means of December 2018, the corporate breached its fiduciary responsibility to its advisory shoppers by failing to reveal conflicts of curiosity in a revenue-sharing program with its clearing agency.

Particularly, Commonwealth failed to inform shoppers that some mutual fund share lessons generated tens of millions of {dollars} in revenue-sharing funds for the agency, whereas different, cheaper share lessons would have generated a lot much less, or no, extra income, the SEC contended within the criticism in U.S. District Court docket in Massachusetts.

The criticism additionally alleged that Commonwealth didn’t undertake and implement written insurance policies and procedures moderately designed to establish and to make sure the disclosure of fabric conflicts of curiosity arising from its income sharing settlement, Commonwealth famous in a report filed with the SEC final month.

Commonwealth doesn’t touch upon pending authorized issues as an organization coverage, Peggy Ho, senior vp, normal counsel and chief danger officer, instructed ThinkAdvisor Friday in an e mail.

In April 2023, the district courtroom issued a abstract judgment discovering that Commonwealth violated the Advisers Act of 1940 by failing to completely disclose conflicts of curiosity from income sharing it obtained with respect to sure mutual fund share lessons, and by failing to implement written insurance policies and procedures to reveal the income sharing compensation, the submitting stated.