JUDGE BAYLSON CLARIFIES APPROPRIATE VEHICLES FOR SEEKING ATTORNEY’S FEES, PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND COMPENSATORY DAMAGES (Philadelphia Federal)

On this case, Philadelphia Federal Choose Baylson reiterates:

Claims for breach of an insurance coverage contract don’t enable for restoration of legal professional’s charges; moderately, legal professional’s charges on this context are solely permitted below the Dangerous Religion Statute.
Frequent legislation breach of an insurance coverage contract claims don’t enable for punitive damages; moderately, punitive damages on this context are solely permitted below the Dangerous Religion Statute.
The Dangerous Religion Statute doesn’t present for restoration of compensatory damages.

Date of Choice: April 29, 2022

Collings v. State Farm Fireplace & Casualty Co., U.S. District Court docket Japanese District Pennsylvania No. 2:22-CV-0057, 2022 WL 1291511 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2022) (Baylson, J.)

Printed by PA Dangerous Religion Weblog